Dynamics of Drinking Hairspray-Water
Mixure
"Ocean" Awareness Project
Wilson J. DeViore, LADAC
Na'nizhoozhi Center Inc., (NCI)
2205 East Boyd
Gallup, NM 87301
(505) 722-2177
The following report was prepared utilizing
the current NCI (Na'nizhoozhi Center Inc.) client populationl. Data was compiled
utilizing NCI records, program information, and interviews. All statistical
averages are specific to the Ocean abusing (hair spray drinking) population as
identified by NCI breathalyzer test.. Additional information was gathered
through collaboration with various GIMC pharmanacy department, GIMC ER, and
other substance abuse counselors.
Introduction
This report briefly evaluates the
chronic alcoholic adult population who are abusing hair spray mix (ocean water).
Data was collected from NCI intake records from January 01, 1999 through April
30, 1999. Upon intake into NCI all intoxicated clients are immediately given a
breath test on a carefully calabrated Intoxalyzer instrument. Normally, breath
alcohol content is indicated on this machine by a reading of .001 to .800. If
this instrument records a reading of "XXX", Ocean (or inhalants) are
then suspected. Self-reports from such clients who record XXX usually confirms
the injestion of Ocean.
It is generally assumed that the NCI's
chronic problem-drinking population are primarily the abusers of ethol alcohol
and that Ocean abuse was rare. The increased number of irregular XXX readings
each month now forces both Ocean usage evaluation as well as the eventual
development of prevention/intervention intervention.
Purpose
1. To investigate and identify Ocean (hair
spray) abuse among NCI clients.
2. To develope prevention stragities to
reduce hair spray abuse.
3. To develope a treatment curriculum.
Target Population
100% Navajo
225 individuals within four months
Sex/Gender
79% male& ; 21% female
178 males 47 females
Age
The target population for this
evaluation includes the age range of 20 to 70 years. (Appendix A).
Findings
Three general groups of Ocean abusers
can be identified:
1. Expermential users: These are both
adults and adolesence who were introduced to Ocean by their peers. They
generally use Ocean due to the legal age restriction and lack of alcohol/drug
availability.
2. Maintenance users: These use Ocean on a
regular basis to avoid and/or cure alcohol hang-over's. This group is very
particular in the amount ingested. For example they only drink at specfic time
intervals to avoid severe intoxication levels and/or black-outs. This group also
has a minimal awareness of Ocean as a hazard but attempt to control the amount
ingested. They are likely to share their drinking with others.
3. Chronic users; These use Ocean on a
daily basis for intoxication with no current intention of stopping. Along with
full intoxication, Ocean usage is also believed by them to actually prevent
severe alcohol withdrawls (DT's, seizures). These drinkers usually have limited
resources to purchase liquor. In this group, it is standard practice that an
individual will consume the entire jug alone (a 1/2 gal. mix made from one can).
This user may even hord a jug alone, drinking to blackout. When he wakes up, he
will drink again to repeat the process.
Groups two and three are responsible for a
majority of NCI intake.
The members of these two groups have
progressed to the chronic stage of the DSM IV criteria for Alcohol Dependency
Disorder (303.90). They have little or no other drug use, have been using
alcohol for many years, and have been through NCI repeatedly. Coming through
NCI's involuntary protective custody program, 75% are identified as homeless and
living in the streets of Gallup. The greatest Ocean abuse exsists within the 34
through 49 year age group. This same age group also represents the highest
percentage of regular protective custody clients in general. Eighty percent of
Ocean abusers are male. During our four month evaluation period, an average of
44.5 different indivual male "Ocean" admissions came in each month
(11.1 male admissions per week). 6 of these individuals came in with XXX
recordings numerious times in one month (Appendix B). The female Ocean
abusers averaged 12.25 admissions per month (3.5 per week). There was an average
of 2.5 female repeater's each month (Appendix B).
The greatest occurance of Ocean admissions
happen on Friday and Saturday (Appendix B). Friday and Saturday pickups tend to
be young to mid range age groups while older clients tend to be picked up
earilier in the week. This is also consisent with the report from the Gallup
Indian Medical Center for weekend admissions to the Emergency Room for severe
Alcohol intoxication. The lowest number of both NCI & GIMC ER Ocean
admissions are on Sunday. Ironically, however, users do report that Sunday is
generally their highest Ocean usage day. These users report that on Sunday they
are less likely to have money, availability of liqour is scarce, and everyone is
most likely to have hangeovers (craving Ocean). Sunday pickups also tend to be
the heavier user. Lower Sunday NCI admissions may be do to other factors such as
fewer police on holiday duty and clients "laying low" (the town is
quiet).
The youngest recorded Ocean abuser in this
time period was 20 and the oldest was 70. Our greatest concern exsists in the
mid-range age group (NCI, however, does not assess anyone younger that 19).
During our four month evaluation, March and April had the highest admissions of
"XXX" breathalyzer readings and the greater number of repeaters
(Appendix B). As also evident within our normal NCI admissions, Ocean usage also
appears to have seasonal fluxcuations.
The data in this analysis does not include
individuals with possible "XXX" readings but who were unable to blow (UTB);
or those whom refused to blow (RTB). Including these non-measured people in the
data may increase the usage figures considerabily. This total of
"not-measurable" number makes up 25% of the total NCI intake numbers
each month. For them, their source of intoxication remains undetermined.
Ocean users make up almost 25% of the total
intake numbers for NCI services each month. An additional 65% to 75% of NCI's
total clients have been introduced to Ocean but are not using it regularily.
Since NCI's opening in 1992, their number of total NCI intakes per Ocean user
ranges from 03 to 379. The Ocean user tends to have a lot of NCI admissions.
Within a one month period, a Ocean user may come in as many as 6 times. 60% of
the Ocaen users are Arizonan Navajos and 40% are from New Mexico.
The average time for protective custody
police "pick up" of the Ocean user was as follows; 50% in the late
morning hours to early afternoon, 30% in the late afternoon to evenings, 20% in
the remaining night hours.
Most of the interviewed Ocan abuser appear
to come from broken families/relationships with high tendencies towards low self
esteem and self pity. On an average, 60% are from the neighboring Navajo
Reservation, 20% are Navajos whom were living off the reservation in
checkerboard areas, and 20% are from nearby border towns just outside of Gallup.
The present home for this group are the surrounding hills of Gallup. NCI is
currently their primary support system. Among the group most would be dual
diagnosed with co-morbid issues of depression, PTSD, anxiety, personality
disorders, abuse isues, and great brievement. There was a lot of disclosure
during the interviews around unresolved emotional trauma. 100% are unemployed
but will occasionally work spot labor jobs to support their drinking behavior
patterns.
Their common attitude about their personal
living status is almost always expressed as hopelessness and full of deep grief.
This group commonly utilizes the Protective Custody (PC) services during the
cold winter months and any other times they need basic personal essentials.
Although constantly cycling through the NCI PC program, this group recieves only
miminal group counseling. The majorty of them have a long history of treatment
failure. Only 1 of the 15 throughly interviewd clients requested treatment. As a
whole, these clients are comfortable with their behavior. Prognosis for
abstinence upon discharge from NCI is poor. The Ocean users motivation to stop
is minimal to none. No theraputic services have been successful in detering this
cyclic pattern of abuse.
Suprisingly, many users actually prefer
Ocean over other forms of liquor (even if it were available). Ocean users have
developed into small street peer groups specific for their usage. As an example,
one "click" of Ocean users are largely "two-spirited" (gay),
another may include fairly disfunctional Veterans. (Ocean users in Gallup often
appear to be a sort of social leper even among the liquor drinkers: they tend to
be lower income, lower functioning, further along in their addiction
progression). Many "non-Ocean" problem-drinkers feel that they are
"better off" because they do not use Ocean. They tend to look down on
the Ocean group. (This does not mean that every Ocean user is in this
disyfunctional category. For example, young users are not included in this
analysis).
Forty percent of Ocean abusers are
currently experiencing medical complications that began sometimes after their
initial use of Ocean. Although the direct relationship of these symptoms to
Ocean, however, has not yet been scientifically determined, we suspect a strong
corlelation. Sadley, the Ocean users have minimal awareness of it's possible
dangerious effect.
When questioned about how they were
introduced to Ocean, all stated that their current drinking friends were
responsible. The common belief among these preer groups is that Ocean abuse was
originally intoduced to New Mexico by Native American Indians from Oklahoma.
Ocean Chemestry
Hair spray tonic (16 oz. can of Aqua
Net, Lysol and Listerine) containes denatured alcohol. (wood alcohol). Normal
liqours contain ethanol alcohol (grain). It is generally thought that wood
alcohol cannot be safely processed by the body.
Contents (varies widely from brand to
brand)
Ethanol (Alcohol) greater than 70 %
Butane 10 to 20 %
Propane 05 to 10 %
Vinyl Acetate/Chrotonic Acid/Neodecanoate
Copolymer 1 to 5% (Hair stiffiner
component which vary in strengh)
Drug Class
Depressant (wood alcohol)
Other chemicals (toxins ???)
Street Name
The term "Ocean" or
"Ocean Water" is derived from the ocean-like foam/suds generated
during the preparation process .
Route of Admission
Oral ingestion
Preparation
A 16 oz. can of the hair spray is
punctured with a nail or sharp object to release the pressure of the canister.
The remaining liquid is the mixed with a half (1/2) gallon jug of water. The
contents are then shaken rapidly or swished back and forth between containers to
release the "burst" generated by the Butane/Propane contents. The
mixture is ready to drink within 3 minutes once the foam/suds settle.
Ocean drink is discribed as producing a
bitter taste with some burning sensation. Some users will utilize additives such
as Kool-aid, orange juice and other pleasant tasting refreshments. Some report
that additives that have aciditity should be avoided because they increase the
burning sensation.
Epidemology
The onset of Ocean euphoria is rapid in
comparison to other liquor. The average time frame of reported intoxication was
three minutes after the initial swallow. The lenght of euphoria can last as long
as five hours. The Ocean jug when shared with five drinkers (at an average of
three big swallows per person) will intoxicate everyone. A heavy chronic user
can consume the entire jug alone (and enter a blackout). User's also indicate
that there are very minimal to no 'hang-over". There is also a gradual
increase in tolerance with prolong use.
Users consistently report a burning
sensation in the abdomin and throat. This symptom is already docummented in the
pharmalogical literature. Other symptoms reported include diarreaha, drowsiness,
a decrease ability to think or concentrate, itchy skin, and blindness. The
common message among the user's was that a drinker must not smoke or run after
Ocean ingestion (to avoid severe bloating and Gastro-intestinal tract bleeding).
There have also been concerns recently regarding some blue/grey discoloration to
the Cornea of the user's eye (this could be directly related to Chrotonic Acid/Chrotonaldehyde
contents of hair spray). The safety profile from most hairspray warns that it is
a corrosive material thats poisonious by intraperitoneal route. Hairspray is
very harmful to the human eye. Hairspray is also flammable and can react with
oxidizing materials. Additional medical concerns include upper respiratory
problems (including lead poisoning identified in breathing difficulties).
Several sudden deaths have recently been contributed to Ocean overdose.
Although dilution of the active hairspray
chemicals with water almost always occurs with the typical user, some chronic
user's have been known to drink the liquid directly from the hairspray canister
in an attempt to increase the potentcy.
Advantages of Ocean Over Other Drugs
1. No Age, Place, Quanity Restrictions:
Availability is a key Ocean factor. Hairspray can be purchased at multiple
locations, including all-night covient stores. There are no limits on age and
quantity purchased. Kids can (and do) buy hairspray. It many cases, the hair
spray is stolen from department stores and from the users family at home.
Hairspray can be purchased by the case at Walmart (NCI counselors have
wittnessed this personally). Hairspray is also easy to shoplift because
hairspray departments are not closely monitored.
2. Cost: Ocean cost is minimal as opposed
to liqour. Hairspray ranges from 99 cents to $1.99 per 16 oz. can depending on
the brand name. Aqua Net is preferred among the user's because of their greater
percentage of alcohol content. Although Ocean usage is not illegal, Ocean
bootlegging is rampent on the Navajo reservation. A single hairspray can is sold
for $6.00. Although the single can is easier to conceal, a user can also buy a
jug and water for an additional $2.00. Pre-mixed jugs are also sold.
3. No Time Limits: There are no
restrictions on hairspray purchase as opposed to the restricted Sunday sales of
liquor. Often it is reported that the Ocean user send in teenagers to purchase
the hair spray to reduce the suspicision of abuse. It is also acknowledged that
woman are more likely to make the purchase without any difficulties.
4. Ocean is a "Prefered High":
Most users report minimal to no Ocean hang-over's as opposed to liquor. Euphoria
appears to be more rapid. Intoxication is also reported as unusally intense.
Ocean users also report that intoxication "odor" is minimal and less
obvious to non-drinking others (unlike the smell of heavy liquor ingestion). The
taste can be modified to suit. Ocean jugs are large and cheap enough to be
readily shared. Detection is also more difficult (PC or DWI arrest) because
Ocean does not register as high numbers on the Intoxalyzer).
Environmental
There are three well know Gallup
"Ocean drinking sites" (Appendix C). These locations are prefered due
to both their isolation and an easy-access water supply. Two of these sites are
a result of parks/recreational water fountains. The sites are also near
all-night convenience stores as well as being away from the main stream of
traffic. All are also located on hills which gives the occupants ample view of
the surroundings. Police patrols seldom visit these areas. These sites are
littered with hair spray canisters, plastic containers, and Lysol desinfectant
containers. These sites are also places Ocean users sleep and relax.. (Because
these sites were recently cleaned by an organization from Tucson, Arizona we now
have an opportunity to time-line new area usage).
Conclusion
Ocean usage is greater than first assumed.
Although the logistical reasons for Ocean usage are important (Sunday
availability, cost, no-restrictions, etc.) the idea that many users actually
prefer the feeling of Ocean intoxication over liqour intoxication presents even
a greater challenge.
Although Ocean usage among teens has not
been addressed in this analysis, NCI counselors believe teen use is potentially
explosive.
Because of their significant
social/environmental problems and emotional/behavioral dsyfunction (combined
with their complete lack of motivation) both prevention and treatment
intervention among this population will be especally challenging.
Strategies against Ocean usage might be
prioritized as follows:
1. Policy development of hairspray
legistaltion, sale control, retailer awareness, improved Breathalyzer
design, public awareness.
2. Prevention and education for 6-18 years
old.
3. Prevention and education of non-Ocean
problem-drinkers in an attempt to keep them from switching
from liqour to Ocean.
4. Treatment intervention of Group one and
two (non-chroic users). Group three will be naturally
included in this blitz but will be inherently less responsive.
References and Acknowldgments
Capt. Cindy Smith R. PH., MPH Pharmancy QI
Coordinator, USPHS Gallup Indian Medical Center Pharmancy Department.
Kathy Van Osten, graduate University of New
Mexico ER Program, ER Nurse, Gallip Indian Medical Center
NCI Clinical Department Staff
NCI Clients